the shadow work journal second edition pdf

The IPCC appears largely to be seen by policymakers as a general source of information on climate change, rather than on solutions to mitigate climate change. Key results, such as carbon budgets from WGI are referenced (e.g.

More puzzling still is how little WGIII’s contribution is used in policy documents. In comparison, the contribution of Working Group III (WGIII) on mitigation has received less coverage in mainstream media and is the subject of fewer online searches. A quick google trends search reveals that the contribution of Working Group I (WGI) to the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), on the science of climate change, has received the most media attention of any IPCC report, followed by the 2018 special report on 1.5 ☌ 1. This appears not currently to be the case. Given the criticality of the next decade for climate policy, IPCC activities that are focused on mitigation could, in principle, become the most relevant. It covers the latest agreed-upon earth system science, issues concerning adaptation and adaptive capacity to climate change, and concepts revolving around the mitigation of climate change. The IPCC has a long history in informing policymakers about the importance of the climate change threat. Whether global emissions targets are met could be determined within the current decade, if policymakers can implement effective climate policy and draw in businesses and society in the collective effort to do so. Similar content being viewed by othersįollowing the Paris and Glasgow Agreements, policymakers around the world are now in a critical position. We conclude that, to become truly policy-relevant, the IPCC’s climate mitigation work is in urgent need of reform to provide more effective support for policy design.

Drawing on the example of alternative climate-economic modelling using the E3ME-FTT framework, we explore a pathway for the IPCC process that could cater for diverse ranges of more realistic granular policies.

Here, we explore how, despite its ‘neutral, policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive’ principle, the IPCC’s analytical scenario process in Working Group III on Mitigation has adopted an implicitly prescriptive policy position in favour of carbon pricing. However, the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which perform the largest available analytical exercise in this area, offer scarce analytics on climate policy design. Climate policymakers across the world seek inputs from the research community to determine appropriate policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The shadow work journal second edition pdf